Method for dating gilgamesh

06-Aug-2019 02:51

Senapatiratne, Timothy Nalin, "The sources of Ecclesiastes: The "Epic of Gilgamesh" as a source document for Ecclesiastes" (2008).

Many people perceive the vast ages assigned to deep ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica as unanswerable arguments for an old earth.

The skeptic has two immediate objections to this creationist response.

First, he would argue that other dating methods can be used as checks to guard against the possibility of over-counting. “Checks” Not That Helpful Explosive volcanic eruptions increase the amount of sulfuric acid in the atmosphere, and these post-eruption acid spikes can be detected within ice cores, as well as volcanic fragments called within the ice can be used as a check to ensure that the annual layer counts above that specific horizon are accurate.

These acids make it a little easier for electricity to pass through the ice, corresponding to increases in the ice’s electrical conductivity.

Hence, when using the ECM method, jumps in the measured electrical conductivity of the ice are thought to indicate annual summer layers.

These conclusions are demonstrated by looking at the methods various scholars have used to compare the Enuma Elish, the Code of Hammurabi, the Ras Shamra Documents and the Instruction of Amenemope with various texts in the Hebrew Bible.

Chapter three examines several previous proposals arguing that Ecclesiastes is dependent on Gilgamesh.

method for dating gilgamesh-84

This multifaceted comparative method, it is argued, must include word parallels, historical connections and genre categorization.For instance, secular scientists have counted 110,000 supposed annual layers in the uppermost 2,800 meters in Greenland’s GISP2 core.(LLS).The acidity of snow and ice is generally higher during the summer.Second, he would argue that it is preposterous to think that secular scientists could be over-counting by much: 110,000 years (or more! However, the dates of volcanic eruptions can generally be confirmed by eyewitness testimony for only the last 300 years, with a small number of eruptions that potentially can be dated as far back as 2,000 years.So volcanic reference horizons cannot be used as checks for layer counts within the deeper parts of the cores.

This multifaceted comparative method, it is argued, must include word parallels, historical connections and genre categorization.

For instance, secular scientists have counted 110,000 supposed annual layers in the uppermost 2,800 meters in Greenland’s GISP2 core.(LLS).

The acidity of snow and ice is generally higher during the summer.

Second, he would argue that it is preposterous to think that secular scientists could be over-counting by much: 110,000 years (or more! However, the dates of volcanic eruptions can generally be confirmed by eyewitness testimony for only the last 300 years, with a small number of eruptions that potentially can be dated as far back as 2,000 years.

So volcanic reference horizons cannot be used as checks for layer counts within the deeper parts of the cores.

Quite simply, secular scientists are over-counting the number of true annual layers.